<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Authorization and intention/origination verification when using the edit_post hook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/</link>
	<description>WordPress puts food on my table.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Travel Planner</title>
		<link>http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-88702</link>
		<dc:creator>Travel Planner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 07:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-88702</guid>
		<description>Useful indeed, I'll check this out...

Thanks for the tip :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Useful indeed, I&#8217;ll check this out&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for the tip <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odysseus</title>
		<link>http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-88068</link>
		<dc:creator>Odysseus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-88068</guid>
		<description>Sorry :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alekos</title>
		<link>http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-86218</link>
		<dc:creator>Alekos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-86218</guid>
		<description>interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poeldappata</title>
		<link>http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-81642</link>
		<dc:creator>Poeldappata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 01:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-81642</guid>
		<description>First touch with the girlfriend in a live, after a while, through ICQ. Today met, and I felt the inability to talk with her on all topics, be open. Like komok in the throat, once tried to have intimate relations on the subject, immediately zamolkal. Yes, and she could not say anything wing. 
Why, Internet communication allows more freedom than the real one? Perhaps some blame my fear, or the ability to label themselves in the Internet masks, I do not know. What do you think about this? 
 
P.S. Please administrator markjaquith.wordpress.com. If the thread is not to be in category this, I ask you to move my thread to the correct category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First touch with the girlfriend in a live, after a while, through ICQ. Today met, and I felt the inability to talk with her on all topics, be open. Like komok in the throat, once tried to have intimate relations on the subject, immediately zamolkal. Yes, and she could not say anything wing.<br />
Why, Internet communication allows more freedom than the real one? Perhaps some blame my fear, or the ability to label themselves in the Internet masks, I do not know. What do you think about this? </p>
<p>P.S. Please administrator markjaquith.wordpress.com. If the thread is not to be in category this, I ask you to move my thread to the correct category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Varseoppova</title>
		<link>http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-72158</link>
		<dc:creator>Varseoppova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 22:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-72158</guid>
		<description>Привет. 
Продаю персональный сертификат WebMoney за $99. 
 
Можете проверить: WMID 322973398779  Redfern 
 
Всё чисто, не одной жалоб. Сделан на утерянные документы. Всё законно. 
Если нужно, то есть сертификаты ещё. 
Стучацо в личную почту на Вебмани. 
 
Это не спам. Не пишите на мой WMID жалобы в арбитраж Вебмани.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Привет.<br />
Продаю персональный сертификат WebMoney за $99. </p>
<p>Можете проверить: WMID 322973398779  Redfern </p>
<p>Всё чисто, не одной жалоб. Сделан на утерянные документы. Всё законно.<br />
Если нужно, то есть сертификаты ещё.<br />
Стучацо в личную почту на Вебмани. </p>
<p>Это не спам. Не пишите на мой WMID жалобы в арбитраж Вебмани.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Varseoppova</title>
		<link>http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-71680</link>
		<dc:creator>Varseoppova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-71680</guid>
		<description>Привет. 
Продаю персональный сертификат WebMoney за $99. 
Можете проверить: WMID 322973398779  Redfern 
Всё чисто, не одной жалоб. Сделан на утерянные документы. Всё законно. 
Если нужно, то есть сертификаты ещё. 
Стучацо в личную почту на Вебмани. 
 
Это не спам. Не пишите на мой WMID жалобы в арбитраж Вебмани.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Привет.<br />
Продаю персональный сертификат WebMoney за $99.<br />
Можете проверить: WMID 322973398779  Redfern<br />
Всё чисто, не одной жалоб. Сделан на утерянные документы. Всё законно.<br />
Если нужно, то есть сертификаты ещё.<br />
Стучацо в личную почту на Вебмани. </p>
<p>Это не спам. Не пишите на мой WMID жалобы в арбитраж Вебмани.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vysnu &#187; MiniPosts fix</title>
		<link>http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-59702</link>
		<dc:creator>Vysnu &#187; MiniPosts fix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-59702</guid>
		<description>[...] (or maybe will never) here&#8217;s the fix. Took me around a half hour of hacking. Thanks to this excellent guide. [The problem was every time somebody commented I lost the &#8216;mini-postiness&#8217; of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (or maybe will never) here&#8217;s the fix. Took me around a half hour of hacking. Thanks to this excellent guide. [The problem was every time somebody commented I lost the &#8216;mini-postiness&#8217; of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonid Mamchenkov</title>
		<link>http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-59246</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonid Mamchenkov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 01:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-59246</guid>
		<description>Mark,

thanks.  I think I'll stay with editor screenshots for my &lt;a href="http://wpbits.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;WordPress Bits&lt;/a&gt; for a little while longer. It's ugly, but it works. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>thanks.  I think I&#8217;ll stay with editor screenshots for my <a href="http://wpbits.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">WordPress Bits</a> for a little while longer. It&#8217;s ugly, but it works. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-48528</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 04:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-48528</guid>
		<description>Leonid,

I used &#60;pre&#62; and then manually encoded my entities, like &#38;&#60; for &#60; and &#38;gt; for &#62;  See also &#38;quot; for &#34;  There are probably online tools that can do this for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leonid,</p>
<p>I used &lt;pre&gt; and then manually encoded my entities, like &amp;&lt; for &lt; and &amp;gt; for &gt;  See also &amp;quot; for &quot;  There are probably online tools that can do this for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonid Mamchenkov</title>
		<link>http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-47398</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonid Mamchenkov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-47398</guid>
		<description>Sorry for an off-topic question, but can you please let me know which technique did you use to post the code snippet in this post?  I've been struggling with WordPress.com's posting thing which kills indentation, converts brackets, and does all sorts of other nasty things to code.

TIA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for an off-topic question, but can you please let me know which technique did you use to post the code snippet in this post?  I&#8217;ve been struggling with WordPress.com&#8217;s posting thing which kills indentation, converts brackets, and does all sorts of other nasty things to code.</p>
<p>TIA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solution to my problem &#171; binarymoon</title>
		<link>http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-21105</link>
		<dc:creator>Solution to my problem &#171; binarymoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 12:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-21105</guid>
		<description>[...] problem but today I noticed it hasd happened again so I went searching and, thanks to Mark Jaquith, have now got the answer The issue occurs because the plugins assume that every time edit_post is triggered, their inserted [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] problem but today I noticed it hasd happened again so I went searching and, thanks to Mark Jaquith, have now got the answer The issue occurs because the plugins assume that every time edit_post is triggered, their inserted [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbnet.it weblog &#187; Archivio blog &#187; Tag e Wordpress 2.1.x</title>
		<link>http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-20873</link>
		<dc:creator>rbnet.it weblog &#187; Archivio blog &#187; Tag e Wordpress 2.1.x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-20873</guid>
		<description>[...] da quanto avevo scritto in precedenza, il plugin Jerome’s Keywords 2.0-beta3 presenta dei noti problemi che portano alla perdita dei tag impostati per gli articoli se viene utilizzato in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] da quanto avevo scritto in precedenza, il plugin Jerome’s Keywords 2.0-beta3 presenta dei noti problemi che portano alla perdita dei tag impostati per gli articoli se viene utilizzato in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbnet.it weblog &#187; Archivio blog &#187; Blog aggiornato a Wordpress 2.1</title>
		<link>http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-20872</link>
		<dc:creator>rbnet.it weblog &#187; Archivio blog &#187; Blog aggiornato a Wordpress 2.1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-20872</guid>
		<description>[...] il plugin Jerome&#8217;s Keywords 2.0-beta3 presenta dei problemi che portano alla perdita dei tag impostati per gli articoli se viene utilizzato in combinazione con [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] il plugin Jerome&#8217;s Keywords 2.0-beta3 presenta dei problemi che portano alla perdita dei tag impostati per gli articoli se viene utilizzato in combinazione con [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Post Avatar 1.2.2 - Garinungkadol</title>
		<link>http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-20514</link>
		<dc:creator>Post Avatar 1.2.2 - Garinungkadol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-20514</guid>
		<description>[...] when used in Wordpress 2.1 - posting comments caused a post&#8217;s avatar to disappear. Thanks to Mark Jaquith&#8217;s post, I&#8217;ve identified and fixed (yay!) the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when used in WordPress 2.1 - posting comments caused a post&#8217;s avatar to disappear. Thanks to Mark Jaquith&#8217;s post, I&#8217;ve identified and fixed (yay!) the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pie Palace &#183; MiniPosts 0.6.4 - Bugfix de jour</title>
		<link>http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-20509</link>
		<dc:creator>Pie Palace &#183; MiniPosts 0.6.4 - Bugfix de jour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 17:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markjaquith.wordpress.com/2007/01/28/authorization-and-intentionorigination-verification-when-using-the-edit_post-hook/#comment-20509</guid>
		<description>[...] Since the edit_post hook is called from all over the place, I've associated a nonce1 with the checkbox that the user fills out for the miniposts. That allows the plugin to tell the difference between a legitimate change request, and a random one triggered by the promiscuous edit_post hook. That approach was suggested by Mark Jaquith. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Since the edit_post hook is called from all over the place, I&#8217;ve associated a nonce1 with the checkbox that the user fills out for the miniposts. That allows the plugin to tell the difference between a legitimate change request, and a random one triggered by the promiscuous edit_post hook. That approach was suggested by Mark Jaquith. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
